The Lifeline Law provides immunity for the crimes of public intoxication, minor…
Portable meth lab trash is dangerous if you suspect a
meth lab call law…
To view the Quiz need to download the free Adobe Flash Player.
The man behind Indiana's Lifeline Law wants to broaden exactly who is protected under it. It's an issue I-Team 8 has been working on for more than a year now.
The Liveline Law was passed last year. It gives immunity to underage drinkers who call police to help a friend in an alcohol-related emergency. But Senator Jim Merritt wants to change that.
I-Team 8 reported on the new law after Carmel teen Brett Finbloom died from drinking too much last year. At the time, his friends were too scared to call 911 when he passed out. He never woke up.
The proposed changes to the law would make it more of a "Good Samaritan" law. Merritt says the goal is simple: save more lives. He says if a teen is trying to help someone who's having any kind of medical emergency — alcohol-related or not — the caller shouldn't get in trouble even if they've been drinking.
Senator Merritt says the expansion proposal was prompted by discussions on college campuses while promoting the current law. Indiana Attorney General Zoeller supports broadening the law. As the law stands now, there are three offenses that aren't protected: drunken driving, possession of a controlled substance and providing to a minor. Senator Merritt plans to introduce the broader law in the General Assembly next yea
When a student dies from intoxication or another alcohol-related incident makes headlines, college drinking captures the public's attention, for a while. On the campus itself, administrators deal with the immediate problem, and campus life soon returns to normal. Generally, the incident doesn't result in effective, long-term changes that reduce the consequences of college drinking.
Among the reasons for this seeming inattention to long-term solutions is that administrators see college drinking as an unsolvable problem. When schools have made efforts to reduce drinking among their students—and many have made considerable effort—they haven't had significant, campus-wide success. With each failed effort, the image of college drinking as an intractable problem is reinforced, administrators are demoralized, and the likelihood that schools will devote resources to prevention programs decreases.
One reason for the lack of success of prevention efforts is that, for the most part, schools have not based their prevention efforts on strategies identified and tested for effectiveness by research. Research on college drinking is a relatively young field, and the data are incomplete. Until the recent formation of the Task Force on College Drinking, administrators and researchers did not typically collaborate on this topic. Without the expertise of the research community, administrators were at a disadvantage in trying to identify and implement strategies or combinations of strategies to address alcohol problems specific to their schools.
The Task Force on College Drinking brought together experienced administrators and scientists, who assessed what both schools and researchers need to do to establish effective prevention programs. On the basis of their findings, they made the recommendations contained in this report. Their recommendations focus not on how to effect some type of blanket prohibition of drinking, but on changing the culture of drinking on campuses and involving the surrounding communities.
Foremost among their recommendations is that to achieve a change in culture, schools must intervene at three levels: at the individual-student level, at the level of the entire student body, and at the community level. Research conducted to date strongly supports this three-level approach. Within this overarching structure, schools need to tailor programs to address their specific alcohol-related problems. Underlying each recommendation is the Task Force's understanding that no two schools are alike, that environmental influences as well as individual student characteristics impact alcohol consumption, and that effective strategies extend beyond the campus itself to encompass the surrounding community.
The Task Force's focus is on how to change the culture that underlies alcohol misuse and its consequences on campus, rather than on simply determining the number of negative alcohol-related incidents that occur each year. But because data on the consequences of college drinking underscore the need for effective prevention strategies, these data are included in the section that follows. The report offers (1) a general approach to incorporating prevention programs on campus, (2) specific interventions that schools can combine to meet the needs of their campuses, and (3) recommendations for future research on college drinking.
Page 1 of 17
Drug Free Noble County 107 Weber Rd., Albion, IN 46701 Tel: (260) 636-2320Fax: (260) 636-6861Email: firstname.lastname@example.org